Compare and contrast two main theories of ?crime and agony?. ??a diabetic at work without a modern insulin injection approaching the lunch break may arouse tense, erratic, short tempered, but that behaviour does not constitute a criminal act?? (Kelly, Holborn and Makin, (1983) sited in; M. Haralambos and M. Holborn (2000)) It is regarded amongst sociologists that physiological characteristics do not cause criminal or deviant behaviour. This paper allow for look at a few of the main functionalist and fighting theories of crime and deviance and conclude with which one, in relation to the title, provides the largest eubstance of evidence.

Functionalist theorists contend that crime and deviance is caused by ?structural tensions? where as dispute theorists argue that ?deviance is deliberately chosen, and often governmental in nature?. Functionalists argue that people commit crimes because thither is something unconventional with the society the individual is in, and that this is what causes the indi...If you want to get a total essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper