Healthcare Quality Measurement United State -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Healthcare Quality Measurement United State? Answer: Introduction The healthcare system in Saudi Arabia is classified as a national health care system wherein the government is responsible for providing services through multiple agencies. Simultaneously, there is a significant role and enhanced participation from the private sector in the growth of healthcare service sector. The present report recommends the suitable structure for a proposed hospital in Saudi Arabia for ensuring optimal benefits. The paper provides a description and assessment of the three forms of hospital structures, namely, profit, not-for-profit and public-private partnership. A comparison and contrast between these there forms are put forward. The report then recommends the appropriate chosen structure that would serve the needs of the population in Saudi Arabia. Description and assessment of each international entity and rules it must follow For-profit organisations are operated as a business corporation or as a subsidiary of the multihospital system. All such hospitals are governed by the business corporation laws of the respective state they belong to. All hospitals are governed by their shareholders who elect a board of directors accountable for conducting the corporation. The board of directors are to employ individuals who can ensure proper daily operations of the organisations, termed as officers or agents. The nature of such hospitals is such that they are required to pay all forms of applicable taxes. Apart from the general regulations under state corporate regulations, such organisations are to follow federal regulation under the federal securities laws. As such hospitals have a particular identity from the owners, the owners of such hospitals are not in a capacity to fulfil the debts owed by the setting to any party. The aim of for-profit hospitals is to generate profits that are to be shared by the shareholder . Corporate employees usually have a profit directed mindset and aspire to maximise the hospitals revenue which leads to increased profits of the owners. The aim might in certain cases accompanied by the urge to serve the society (Niles, 2016). A non-profit organisation, also termed as a non-business entity is directed towards a social cause and advocacy of a shared point of view. Speaking in an economic context, such a hospital uses the revenues for achieving the ultimate objective revolving around charitable causes, instead of distributing the income to the shareholders and members. Non-profit hospitals have a board of executives and directors, managerial and different administrative positions. Such organisations are tax exempt. The hospitals are governed by bodies how are accountable for community health promotion. The activities are guided by ethical standards of healthcare practice (Folland et al., 2016). Hospitals that are run on private-public partnership are those with the long-term contract between one or more private sector companies and one public sector authority operational in the country as a legal entity. The government is to provide the strength of its purchasing power, empower private enterprise and outline goals for the health system. The private sector receives the payment for the services and faces operational and financial risks while gaining the benefits from shared cost saving. The larger scope of such hospitals to manage and finance infrastructure means a larger market for private organizations (Torchia et al., 2015). Comparison and contrast between the three types As opined by Burstin et al., (2016) medical services tend to vary depending on the ownership since hospital types prioritise gaols in a different manner. Though all hospitals earn sufficiently to operate effectively, evidence suggests that for-profit hospitals are more likely to respond to profitability as compared to other types of hospitals when taking major decisions. Since hospitals with private-public partnerships have more chances of providing unprofitable services that are not proportionately needed by underinsured patients, such hospitals are last resort for service users. Non-profit hospitals have been found to be lying in an intermediate position in terms of serving the needy and seeking profits. Top et al., (2015) argue that non-profit hospitals are inclined towards providing higher access levels and quality of care than for-profit ones. However, removal of the tax-exempt status of nonprofit hospitals might have a negative impact on the number of benefits gained by the community and the quality of care provided. The authors argue that managers in for-profit hospitals might be performing better as compared to nonprofit hospitals since there is an absence of proprietary incentives in the latter structure. Recommendations for the chosen structure that would best serve the needs of the community As highlighted by Yusuf (2014) Saudi Arabia has seen major progress in the recent past in terms of healthcare as hospitals have gained international recognition. However, the health expenditures and increasing population are forcing the government to bring about considerable changes in the healthcare system. The present healthcare system in the country has been found to be ill-prepared to address the concerns of healthcare needs. Thus, the proposed hospital in the present context is recommended to be a for-profit organisation. This recommendation is put forward since for-profit hospitals are essential for boosting the development of the overall care system of the community. There is a surge noticed in the affluence-related illnesses in the community and for withstanding the growth of the population for-profit hospitals are encouraged. Non-profit hospitals struggle to find the funds for upgrading healthcare technology and maintaining existing resources. A for-profit hospital would be having adequate capital for investing in state-of-art equipment, ensuring high quality care. Measures show that for-profit hospitals are better in quality when compared to other forms (Alkhamis, 2017). Since multiple changes are expected to be needed in the ethos of healthcare in the community with the passage of time owing to the economic and regulatory environment, a for-profit organisation would be appropriate. Conclusion In recent times, there is a considerable increase in the number of for-profit healthcare settings, especially hospitals across the globe, including Saudi Arabia. An increase in the number of for-profit hospitals has challenged the prevailing concepts of non-profit hospitals and public-private partnership hospitals. Since the political, social and economic implications of the three structures and distinct, the need of evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of each before proposing a new hospital in the country was likely. At the end, it is to be concluded that a for-profit hospital would be appropriate for the proposed hospital in Saudi Arabia community. The suggestion has been based on evidence drawn from literature. References Alkhamis, A. A. (2017). Critical analysis and review of the literature on healthcare privatization and its association with access to medical care in Saudi Arabia.Journal of infection and public health,10(3), 258-268. Burstin, H., Leatherman, S., Goldmann, D. (2016). The evolution of healthcare quality measurement in the United States.Journal of internal medicine,279(2), 154-159. Folland, S., Goodman, A. C., Stano, M. (2016).The Economics of Health and Health Care: Pearson International Edition. Routledge. Niles, N. J. (2016).Basics of the US health care system. Jones Bartlett Learning. Top, M., Akdere, M., Tarcan, M. (2015). Examining transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in Turkish hospitals: public servants versus private sector employees.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,26(9), 1259-1282. Torchia, M., Calabr, A., Morner, M. (2015). Publicprivate partnerships in the health care sector: a systematic review of the literature.Public Management Review,17(2), 236-261. Yusuf, N. (2014). Private and public healthcare in Saudi Arabia: future challenges.International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED),2(1), 114-118.