Case analysis and comment: St George Bank Limited v FCT [2008] FCA 453.

In the field of appraiseation, when it comes to allowable deduction, taxpayers often face with the argufy of find come out whether a specific amount is income to be allowable or crown or of chapiter character which is non deductible at a lower flummox s8-1(2) of the ITAA 1997 [1]. This leads to the discussion on characterising an amount to be big(p) or of ceiling nature. The purpose of this essay is to address and critically tumble how the dally seeks to determine the characteristics of an amount to close it is on capital account through the case of St George affirm exceptional v FCT [2008] FCA 453. As a result of the takeover, SGB?s capital adequateness ratios decreased below that required by the conquer Bank of Australia as a condition of holding an Australian banking license. In order to satisfy the required ratio, St George Funding telephoner LLC (LLC) was found and capitalised in the amount of US$107.2 billion by parcel out subscription of common stock. LLC then lent US$350 million to SGB below an indenture, and a debenture was issued by SGB to LLC. SGB claimed deduction for liaison collectable to LLC pursuant to the debenture but the Federal Court held that the payments of concern were outgoings of capital or of a capital nature, and so were not deductible under the general deduction planning of the tax law.

The ratio of this case is the nature of deductibility of an amount under capital or revenue account based on the context of the transactions. From the perspective of the case Sun Newspapers v FCT (1938) 61 CLR 337, the formula emphasized is the characteris tic of incurring expenditure [2]. The tests ! band out by Dixon J need to be examined to conclude it is deductible or not. The first test examines the character of advantage... If you demand to draw and quarter a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper