'Position paper – Accreditation Essay\r'

'Hello,\r\nThis assigning is for a subject called: prime(a) Management for wellness Services\r\nAssignment 2: business office paper †Accreditation\r\nWeighting: 20%\r\n continuance: 1000 words\r\nâ€Å"Accreditation curriculums for health serve or facilities be non useful.” prove this statement with reference to specific accreditation programs. In your response substantiate your claims with reference to literature.\r\nThe assignment will be marked victimisation the following criteria:\r\n1. Style, formation and presentation 10% [2 marks]\r\n2. Demonstrated understanding of principles and frameworks of accreditation 30% [6 marks]\r\n3. translation of strengths and/or weaknesses of accreditation programs 30% [6 marks]\r\n4. Identification of opportunities for improvements in accreditation programs 30% [6 marks].\r\n Introduction †Accreditation is a suffice of certifying and approving that the work or products produced by a authentic brass tint with cert ain(p) standards in quality. In Australia, unity of the presidencys that provide accreditation for hospitals and other health keeping organizations is the Australian Council on health distribute Standards (ACHS). The main accusing of this organization is to improve the quality of healthc be in Australian hospitals. ACHS is an independent organization that works for non-profit purposes and conducts studys of the performance, quality assessments, and so ontera during the accreditation wreak.\r\nIt was create in the category 1974, and several other organizations some(prenominal)(prenominal) as the Australian Medical Council, the Australian wellnessc atomic number 18 Association, and the medical colleges association take up approved accreditation by the ACHS. For determining the standards in the level of health billing, a committee formed containing representatives from various sectors of the population including the general public, g everywherenment, hospitals, etc. The Council members vote for the Board of Directors.\r\nIn the year 1996, the ACHS had launched a unique quality program titled Evaluation and character reference amelioration Program (EQuIP), the main aim of which was to reelect customer-oriented health anxiety function to the people. A taxonomical external peer review process was set in place to about monitor the program. The ACHS has about an 800-organization subscription and also acts as a consultancy to several other organizations end-to-end the world (ACHS, 2007).\r\nBody †Accreditation is a substance of issuing trust. Any consumer who requires healthcare services desires those healthcare services to be of total quality and ensuring safety. It provide be understood that in healthcare there are certain amount of risks, which tin can completely be reduced to a certain extent. Accreditation is one of the center by which these risks can be reduced and quality care can be ensured.\r\nThe patients should identi fy means by which these risks can be reduced. by dint of accreditation, the entire process of providing medical care is well documented, besides being charge proof. This would ensure that a process would be setup that would be based on strong evidences, ensuring conk out patient trouble. Accreditation is frequently determined by the healthcare and the accreditation organization in strong technical terms that have to be fulfilled (ACHS, 2007).\r\nIn the year 2006, the Australian Com foreign mission that well-kept safety and quality in the healthcare sector felt accreditation standards needed to be improved. They also felt that an independent review process was needed to raise the level of fond regard to quality standards in healthcare organizations in Australia. The organization felt that accreditation is a process to publicly recognize the achievements and adherence of the healthcare organizations national standards.\r\nAccreditation should be do available to all public and snobby sector organizations, and at different levels including community-based, private-health setups and third healthcare organizations. The accreditation organization should function independent of the organizations that it would be accrediting. This would ensure that the performance and the standards that are present in the organization are given no bias by the accrediting organization (ACHS, 2007).\r\nBenefits of the accreditation schema: â€\r\nGreater employment of the public and the healthcare organizations\r\nThe clinicians who are answerable for providing quality care can be involved.\r\n breaks the community confidence levels in the healthcare trunk\r\n split up risk management in patient care\r\n violate compliance with the laws (reduction in medical malpractice cases)\r\n longanimous safety standards are improved\r\n commandment of the staff members towards developing good practices\r\n readiness of professional advice and guidance\r\nStaff nurture and tra ining\r\n underdeveloped strong mission statements, values and objectives for the organization\r\nThe human imagination processes can be effectively handled\r\n complaisance with the standards enforce by the regulatory bodies\r\n give way management of insurance claims and those of third parties\r\n decrease in the insurance costs\r\n fail handling of the organization and the management\r\nBetter flow of information\r\nBetter decision-making processes\r\nCo-ordination can be improved\r\nBuilding a proper evaluation arranging\r\nDeveloping areas in which priority and attention is necessitate (Australian relegating on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2007 & adenine; JCAHO, 2007)\r\nDisadvantages would also be applicable, including: â€\r\nHuge costs of accreditation which is eventually passed on to the patient\r\nEmphasis on resources such as human, support systems, etc.\r\nThe standards have to be continually updated, ever-changing the area of concentration\r\nAccreditation would concentrate on improving structure rather than services\r\nGreater attention on increase collaboration and partnership\r\nIt may be difficult to streamline the processes\r\nAccreditation may not have an effect over the outcomes\r\n in that location may be huge accent mark on competition present in the market\r\nNeed to subscribe to accreditation by more than one organization (PHF, 1997)\r\nIn the year 2007, the Australian kick on Safety and Quality in Health Care gave an alternate model for accreditation of healthcare organizations. Consultation with the stakeholders helped to identify the deficiencies in the sure system and to develop a better one. The idea was to apply this new alternate(a) accreditation system across all the sectors of healthcare in a phased manner.\r\nCharacteristics of this new accreditation system: â€\r\nImplementing certain reforms\r\nBringing about certain standards in the Australian healthcare system\r\nThe system was to be developed in assoc iation with the stakeholders\r\n ameliorate the quality standards\r\nImprove the compliance levels with the rules in the healthcare organization\r\nEnsure evidence-based practices\r\nImprove the monitoring system\r\nSupport mutual recognition\r\nImprove the participation levels\r\nImprove the assessments levels, methods and surveys\r\nObligations to be imposed so that the organization adheres to the standards (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2007).\r\nConclusion †It can be express that the entire process of accreditation needs to be setup in such a way that emphasis is given exactly in improving the patient care and satisfaction. All the meaningless process and structures that do not have an effect over improving the patient care should be removed. The accreditation organization should ensure that such a system of accreditation is practically applicable by various types of healthcare organizations. Not much emphasis should be given on costs. Eve n organizations that are providing cost-effective care and are meeting with reasonable standards should be provided accreditation. Accreditation should also be a freewill system and not a dogmatic one. Different levels of accreditation should also be provided (PHF, 1997).\r\n \r\nReferences:\r\nAustralian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). â€Å"About US.” [Online], operable: http://www.achs.org.au/whatwedo/, [Accessed: 2008, work 17].\r\nAustralian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). â€Å"Mission, vision and values.” [Online], lendable: http://www.achs.org.au/missionvisionvalues/, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\nAustralian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). â€Å"What accreditation means.” [Online], operational: http://www.achs.org.au/whataccredmeans/, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\nAustralian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). â€Å"ACHS prospect Statements.” [Online], Available: http://www.achs.org.au/positionstatements/ , [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\nAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). â€Å"UPDATE: Review of bailiwick Safety and Quality Accreditation Standards November 2007.” [Online], Available: http://www.safetyandquality.org/ earnings/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/accreditation, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\nAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). â€Å"Draft: An Alternatvie mildew for Safety and Qualtiy Accreditation.”\r\nBarnes, A.M. (2001). â€Å"Healthcare Law: Desk Reference.” Ali-Aba. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=KS5xke6-DEgC&dq=accreditation+advantages+healthcare&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0\r\nJCAHO (2007). â€Å"Benefits of Joint Commission Accreditation.” [Online], Available: http://www.jointcommission.org/HTBAC/benefits_accreditation.htm, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\nJCAHO (2007). â€Å"PSP Fact Sheet.” [Online], Available: http://www.jcipatientsafety.org/fpdf/ICPS/PSP%20 Fact%20Sheet%20with%20New%20Logo.doc, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\n public Health bag (1998). â€Å"Accreditation: A Study of Issues and Characteristics Applicable to Public Health.” [Online], Available: http://www.phf.org/Reports/Accreditation1/final_report.htm, [Accessed: 2008, March 17].\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n'